Standard university major selection
For applicants who need systematic, defensible priorities among programme and university choices.
12,000,000 toman
Checkout and scheduling. Orders can be submitted in English. The secure payment page may be presented in Persian. The confirmed order amount and payment status can be checked in your account; payment alone does not confirm a consultation appointment or guarantee delivery by a specific date. The scope and timing are agreed through the established professional follow-up process.
The professional question
For applicants who need systematic, defensible priorities among programme and university choices. A responsible engagement begins by establishing which decision requires support and which information can legitimately inform it. A service label alone cannot replace this clarification.
An ordered preference list should express the applicant's priorities while remaining consistent with verified eligibility, institutional requirements and official admission information. Guidance is therefore a process of transparent comparison, not a promise that a particular programme will offer admission.
What this service delivers
A structured development and review of preferences grounded in the applicant’s verified information. The deliverable is framed in terms of evidence, traceable reasoning and a practicable next step rather than a guaranteed personal or institutional outcome.
Scope and exclusions
Admission is not guaranteed; official capacity and admission rules apply.
Process and quality safeguards
- Clarify the question, relevant context and service boundaries.
- Review the information voluntarily supplied by the client, proportionate to the task.
- Discuss alternatives and prepare the specific output described above.
- Communicate limitations, practical next steps and any agreed follow-up.
The service preserves informed judgement. Sensitive educational records are not publicly displayed, and claims of guaranteed admissions or personal outcomes are excluded.
Questions before ordering
Who is this service designed for?
For applicants who need systematic, defensible priorities among programme and university choices.
What is the expected outcome?
A structured development and review of preferences grounded in the applicant’s verified information.
What is not included?
Admission is not guaranteed; official capacity and admission rules apply.
Does paying reserve a specific time or guarantee a result?
No. The server verifies payment separately; scheduling and any follow-up require subsequent coordination. The service does not guarantee examination outcomes, admission or other external decisions.
Pricing, transparency and next step
Current published tariff: 12,000,000 toman for the stated scope. Changes to scope and any additional engagement require clarification before an additional charge. The final payable amount is confirmed before you proceed to the payment page.
For cancellation, receipts or clarification, consult the purchase guide, customer policy and receipt information. These documents are currently provided in Persian.
Academic evidence and interpretive limitations
A defensible programme shortlist distinguishes verified admission rules from unofficial predictions and makes the applicant’s own priorities explicit. Labour-market information can broaden the comparison, but access to information alone does not establish which educational path will serve one individual best.
Relevant scholarly and professional sources
- Hofer, Zhivkovikj & Smyth (2020), OECD Education Working Paper No. 229
- AERA, APA & NCME (2014), Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
These works inform general professional principles. Their citation is not independent endorsement or validation of this commercial service, its assessment instruments or its outcomes.